Escape

The word "escape" can has different meanings in different contexts During Missionary times, when different religious groups from Europe were trying to convert "others" into Christianity, escape had a connotation of freedom from backwardness, illiteracy and uncivilized life. Becoming christian and devoting one's life to Jesus Christ and his preaching were one medium to escape from obscurity to reach towards light. In the pretext of educating, civilizing tribal people, European countries colonized them and in fact escaped themselves from poverty, unemployment and dark ages. So by helping other to escape from a "bad" life, they helped themselves to attain a good and prosperous life. But a minute study of the impact of European rule in the colonized countries would reveal that the meaning of "escape" doesn't had the same degree in two contexts. For the Europeans, the escape was from a dark middle ages to a new colonization era which made this continent as centre of wealth and power while for colonized it became indeed a return from prosperous life and self dependency to poverty. India and many African countries are example where local industries were ruined by European rulers for the benefit of western merchants. So we can observe how the word "escape" had a just opposite meaning for a million of people whose destiny was rewritten by the hands of European countries who were blind and deaf.

In enlightenment era, during 18th century, Europe was in his way to become a industrialized continent with more emphasis on Science and Technology. Logic and reason became symbol of new Europe. Philosophers and scientists flourished. Descartes, Rousseau, Voltaire sowed the grains of logical reflexive in mass. This "escape" was even visible in literature where Voltaire other European writers shifted the focus of literature from classical stories to logical writing.

Majority-Minority: how and why

Each country has two different groups: one who is oppressed and other oppressor. Their religion can be different but the stories of their ill-fated life are same. For example, in India Muslims pay the role of victim whereas Hindus of oppressor but very quickly this role gets inverted after some thousand kilometers. The very same religion and its sympathizers, Muslims, kill, torture, victimize Hindus and other minorities living in Pakistan. According to an article published in The Sunday Guardian date 6^th August 2015, number of Hindu population has sharply declined to 1.5% and there is no stopping of it in nearby future. On the other hand, Muslims can rightly play the role of minorities but their situation is far better than the minorities in Muslim countries, although Indian ruling class regularly try to portray Muslims as terrorists or as anti-national elements.

We can blindly generalize this phenomenon to other Muslim countries like Gulf countries, Malaysia where minorities’ life is even worse than animals. But western countries cannot claim to be immune to this majority-minority crisis. In fact, the very first such conflict between dominant and dominated has resulted in Crusades fought between Arab Muslims and European Christians as early as 10^th century A.D. The recent trend of islamophobia across Europe and especially in North America proves this. The concept of majority-minority is not uniquely related to religion as it surpasses religious structure and encompasses other factors too. Caste (in case of India), gender, race also decide who will be a part of majority camp and who will a part of those, who fight every day, each single hour to get what’s their right.